Featured
Featured
On August 3, 2026, the International Committee of the Red Cross met privately with detained leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in Naypyidaw. This brief analyses the event, Burmese political reactions, and historical precedents of regime-ICRC interactions to outline strategic policy recommendations for revolutionary actors and international partners.
Myanmar’s Spring Revolution faces critical internal challenges. Beyond fighting the military regime, resistance forces are increasingly strained by inter-factional rivalries and territorial disputes. This analysis explores how internal divisions and junta-led disinformation threaten the movement's strategic momentum, emphasising the urgent need for unified, democratic principles during the revolution.
This critical analysis examines whether the recent informal Pattaya meeting advances ASEAN’s Five-Point Consensus or merely offers Myanmar’s military junta a path to political legitimacy. It reveals how intersecting Thai national interests, junta survival strategies, and legacy peace frameworks threaten to undermine a genuine resolution to Myanmar’s crisis.
Following the 2021 military coup in Myanmar, the junta has dismissed international peace initiatives as "internal interference." However, a closer examination of the ASEAN and UN Charters reveals that these diplomatic efforts—and the mandate for inclusive dialogue—align fully with international law and collective regional security responsibilities.
As the post-WWII international order fractures, the world is transitioning into a complex multipolar era. Examining shifts in global power, technological disruption, and domestic governance models like federal democracy, this article introduces "political gravity"—a framework of shared norms and institutions essential for maintaining stability amid growing global diversity.
In late June 2026, U.S. officials quietly met with Myanmar’s military regime to discuss tackling Southeast Asian cyberscam centres. However, history warns that partnering with the junta—a primary beneficiary of this criminal enterprise—mirrors past failed anti-narcotics efforts, risking taxpayer dollars and granting unearned legitimacy to an oppressive regime.